ITC Bridge > Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC) > Frequency Sweep | Radio Sweep Tuning > Easy radio mods / do it yourself |
ITC Bridge and iDigitalMedium.com are now VARANORMAL.COM Please visit: https://www.varanormal.com This site does not allow new registrations, and is now an online archive of a decade of Paranormal and ITC (Instrumental Transcommunication) experimentation from 2007 - 2016 We thank you for a wonderful decade! ~ Keith Clark & Ron Ruiz |
Moderated by: Vicki Talbott, Keith Clark, ArizonaEvp |
Author | Post | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keith Clark Administrator
|
Hi, Today I decided to pick up several radio shack radios and see how hard it was to mod them with the intention of experimenting with the sweep method. Thanks to UFOGeek & several other unknown contributors out there on the web, I found it extremely easy. Basically, the connection labeled "mute" on the circuit board was eliminated, enabling continuous scan on these radios. From conception to completion, I was done in under an hour with both radios. I was pretty happy about that, and am grateful to the people who contributed their time to share their knowledge and experience with others. The radio models were: Radioshack 12-469 and Radioshack 12-470 (older version with grey and white case) I can tell you that the 12-470 scans much faster than the 12-469, making it less likely to record a "false positive." It also covers several other bands (which you probably won't use anyway, but I would recommend it between the two.) As far as my opinion on the sweep method - It's very simple. I try everything I can to learn as much as I can about it. If I record results I am happy with, I will post them. Keith Related Links for this post: http://www.ufogeek.com/?p=103 http://www.ufogeek.com/12-470mod.wmv http://www.ufogeek.com/12-469mod.wmv |
|||||||||
Keith Clark Administrator
|
After a review and some use of the radios, I could say that I recommend the 12-470 by far and way above the 12-469. The internal antenna on the 469 is horrible, I get very poor reception, it sweeps slower, and it doesn't even have a speaker. Just a heads up for those of you considering buying one. Keith |
You have chosen to ignore ParanormalAnalysisLab. click Here to view this post |
---|
Joined: | Feb 23rd, 2007 |
Location: | |
Posts: | 174 |
Status: |
Offline
|
Joined: | Aug 3rd, 2008 |
Location: | |
Posts: | 3 |
Status: |
Offline
|
You have chosen to ignore ckmscott. click Here to view this post |
---|
Joined: | Nov 6th, 2008 |
Location: | |
Posts: | 1 |
Status: |
Offline
|