View single post by Old GUy
 Posted: Jun 23rd, 2010 08:37 AM
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Old GUy

 

Joined: Jun 10th, 2010
Location:  
Posts: 12
Status: 
Offline
Perhaps I'm just being stubborn, but the statement isn't just claiming "existence of an ongoing life." The claim being made is that it's been "proven." I can't bring myself to reconcile with such a patrently false statement. It flies in the face of any reasonable interpretation of the scientific method.

"Whilst there is much objective evidence, the concept is not yet "proven" to my satisfaction." Ah. Are you confessing to be a lurker here? I could only do that for so long before I'd have to open my big mouth.

If you should find yourself in the company of two or more physicists, ask their opinion of Young's (double slit) Experiment. That always get them going. ;-)