 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Dec 31st, 2006 |
| Location: | Clearwater, Florida USA |
| Posts: | 1637 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I feel the need to make sure that I clarify the purpose of the Spiricom topic. I failed to do that earlier, and just want to make sure that the intent of this Spiricom Topic is clear.
Please keep the material posted in this thread to experimental attempts that would be related to Spiricom.
To define "related to Spiricom": In order to at least be considered similar, an experimenter would use a combination of tones and/or a transmitter/receiver combination. This forum is for experimenters who attempt to duplicate and refine the methods used by Meek and O'Neil.
One of the major differences between Spiricom and regular radio attempts is that in Spiricom experiments the experimenter is the creator and author of the original source of the radio signal and the audio tones. In normal radio comunications the experimenter is usually only the receiver of what arrives at the final destination.
Thanks,
Keith
Last edited on Jan 10th, 2008 08:26 PM by Keith Clark