ITC Bridge Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

ITC Bridge has evolved into our sister site iDigitalMedium.com Please join us there or look us up on Facebook. For those of you interested in LIVE streams, go to http://idigitalmedium.com/streams As of 3/13/18 we will not be registering new users. We thank you for a wonderful 10+ years! ~ Ron & Keith

 Moderated by: Keith Clark, joecioppi, EVPfan, EVPDave, Bruce, ArizonaEvp
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Another new way of thinking ?  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Jun 21st, 2008 03:28 PM
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Slider2732
Member
 

Joined: Mar 3rd, 2008
Location: Muskogee, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 349
Status: 
Offline
While watching TV today, we saw that The Andromeda Strain, by Michael Crichton, would be coming on next. Not knowing whether it was by that author or Robin Cook, I had a quick look online.
In the results for the author, was a fairly large preview of the book on one website...a short paragraph got me thinking.

From Page 257
"All these methods suffer the traditonal drawback to any radiation, that of decreasing strength with distance. A light bulb may be unbearably bright at ten feet; it may be powerful at a thousand feet; may be visible at 10 miles. But at a million miles, it is completely obscure, because radiant energy decreases according to the fourth power of the radius. A simple, unbeatable law of physics."

 
Practically everything we do, for data collection in the ITC realm, measures and records energy. That energy is thought to be transmitted, by deceased persons, our aim being to repeat a contact by some means by usage of devices.
So, considering the 'fourth power of the radius' law, are we sure that energy emissions really are the best method of data collection for study ?
It may be argued, that what other means could be used ? After all, if it isn't recordable, how can any fluctuations be actually measured ?

The idea for this thread, was simply to point a personal observation out, that emissions or alterations in an environment of energy are normally recorded.

One idea, for change, is to use active energy displacements. Methods more akin to radar than any receiver only apparatus. Changes would still be the order of the day, but, not affected by the power output ability any entity may be able to emit.
Shadows are popular for sightings, many EVP are awful unless the voice appears to be right on or inside the recorder, traditional TV ITC relies upon images affecting the TV image. There seems to be little that scans using its own energy and records the changes compared to expected returns.

Just a thought :)


Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Jun 22nd, 2008 07:11 PM
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
MrZeta
Member


Joined: Jun 8th, 2008
Location: Maine USA
Posts: 74
Status: 
Offline
I think this would be a good thread to throw some ideas around and I can fill you in on my esoteric thinkings.

One main problem is the electronics itself; mainly things like opamps and transistors (aside from feedback loops which is another topic).

I built a simple wheatstone bridge for data sampling; had ONE OpAmp and no feedback; after some tweaking to get the noise down, a radio religious of sorts station popped in for about 10 seconds; very freaky; it was like a surreal type station.

The circuit itself was a simple DC amp (fast response DC to audio on the input; the wheatstone bridge being in front); there was some sensitivity on the input, and I got wierd noises on the output. The circuit still sits in it's breadboard for probly over a year. The main purpose was to amplify light waves of varying nature and it wasnt very selective.

I found out later that OpAmps themselves have inner feedback loops; I wasnt too happy.

This may have me go back to old transistors (isnt it odd that I have some good collections of them!) (and tubes galore); and think about tubes; it was the tube radio and TV that first picked up EVP ! (I am ok with tubes but need more time and space to work on them).

As for light/sound physics and distance laws; we have to remember that these laws may not apply in other dimensions; it's not an assumption.

I had invisioned, or perceived from external sources, that some or certain frequencies act as barriers or lighthouses for beings in other dimensions of space and time. Some personal experience comes from one astral dream I had. It was as if I was flying along to some destination, and hit a solid wall I couldnt see; I managed to get around it; it was like, and I was led to believe, it was a microwave beam, much like that in our microwave radio towers; we must have beams all over the place at 500-1000 above ground level.

There are indirect and direct methods of data recording. One I am working on uses plants as more of a yes/no type response. This is also where mediums are at their best. There is almost always some sort of electromagnetic detection available, and the indirect methods (taking data and looking at them later) seem to the best to start with.

Sounds like you're talking about sending energy out for entities to manipulate; we are probly already doing that. There may be evidence that for example the external mic input was terminated with 600-1000 ohms on a portable tape recorder, and voices were still recorded !!

I havnt verified this yet however I am very excited at this prospect; it shows that they have versatility in their means of transmissions; we just don t know which beings do the best and with what means; it's trial and error for all of us.

Some beings may be attached to us, and they only have few means of communicating with us.

Again the Spiricom is a good example of transmitting tones, and the interaction of them with radio waves produces voices.

I think it is a good point of producing energies to help them possibly increase the power output of their voice(s).

Getting to area localization of voices/transmissions. I was very discouraged for along time  thinking that I would have to create portable audio labs and go to 'haunted' places; then for kicks I made a few basic recordings in my house. Well needless to say, I got voices on the tape; I was, again, very shocked in somewhat disbelief; these werent radio stations; I knew better.

There is another theory that our own government has committed conspiracies against us, including testing of 'esoteric' communications systems; this is evident in spread spectrum, and as such is used in secure comms; we just have to be alert to this possibility.

And usually with conspiracies come coverups.

I strongly feel that feedback loops of special types are what alow the best forms of amplification; unfortunately they are difficult to control; but we are getting better at it for sure.

This led me to crystals. A crystal in a circuit is amplified through the use of a loop, and it's harmonic is picked off for frequency stabilization.

What is neat is the study of chaos and complexity. These study the borders of feedback loop sensitivities, and it is in these areas that I believe there are even more possibilities of voice/video amplification of low levels !

After some basic tests in my own home, I couldnt understand how our own physics fit into this; however it does somehow; we need to accept some things and fill in the blanks later.

Again for example radio sweep methods are not just for recieving (!!); when we detune anything, we are also transmitting the same sources electrically and magnetically. Also, dont stand or put yer ear next to a satellite dish; it is also transmitting microwaves (!!); most people dont know that. They also transmit behind the dish, especially the older ones.

There is alot of good discussion on this, however science has become oblivious unless it can be experimentally proven regularly.

MrZeta

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Jun 26th, 2008 03:38 PM
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
Slider2732
Member
 

Joined: Mar 3rd, 2008
Location: Muskogee, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 349
Status: 
Offline
Enjoyable reading :)
The Op-amp circuit is something I might well try, everyone into soldering seems to know about noisy transistors, but noise within chips is something I hadn't really thought about. Noise suppression is always the goal, it seems, and so actually using that noise in portable battery devices is a fresh direction. I'll be back building things as soon as we settle into our new house. With relatives coming over from England in August and closing not til later July, I might be parked up for a while though !
Time to think out some ideas though, rather than wade in with the soldering iron.

The realisation that spirits really are all around us, is something that takes years to appreciate, or never in most cases. I'm kind of getting used to that thought...certainly, just known haunted spots aren't the only places that act as some form of portal. I believe we ourselves are the portal and our minds control the receiving frequencies.

Better rush right now, am sat in a car running wi-fi on my crabby laptop...but hope to hear more thoughts :biggrin:

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Nov 24th, 2008 12:45 PM
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
joecioppi
Moderator


Joined: Sep 22nd, 2008
Location: Doylestown, Pennsylvania USA
Posts: 130
Status: 
Offline
Friends,

I think that all means of instrumentation have mechanical origins. Electronic means is convenient and requires less individual craft than mechanical means. The mistake made with electronic instrumentation is giving electrical energy itself a paranormal quality.

The quality of intelligence is inherent in the universe and is carried by natural energies to the instruments applied to detect intelligence. This is why non-electronic methods also can produce paranormal voices or messages. The surrounding environment is the local carrier of universal intelligence and doesn't suffer from the square root law.

Spirit can literally be heard in the wind, a waterfall, or the surf noise at the oceans edge.

joecioppi




Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Nov 24th, 2008 04:25 PM
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
Slider2732
Member
 

Joined: Mar 3rd, 2008
Location: Muskogee, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 349
Status: 
Offline
Thanks Joe :)

This way of thinking has actually given rise to the Occam...a new paranormal device i'm working on and, yeah, to be housed in a former electric razor casing *ahem*
Idea is to emit purely and receive purely. Contamination can then be ascertained as natural or possibly more. I'll be using a red laser and CD-rom optics...the mirrors inside having the property of both direction change and allowing light to go straight through. Calibrations will hopefully enable detections of light change based on those optics. Changes to light readings should be interesting when the device is used to monitor waterfalls etc. I'm hoping the random returns of something like a flowing body of water would produce, or smoke, may be graphable as a spirit image.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 09:41 PM  
ITC Bridge > Instrumental Transcommunication (ITC) > The Creative Corner - Miscellaneous Electronic ITC Experimenting > Another new way of thinking ? Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1518 seconds (30% database + 70% PHP). 24 queries executed.