 |
| |
| ITC Bridge and iDigitalMedium.com are now VARANORMAL.COM Please visit: https://www.varanormal.com This site does not allow new registrations, and is now an online archive of a decade of Paranormal and ITC (Instrumental Transcommunication) experimentation from 2007 - 2016 We thank you for a wonderful decade! ~ Keith Clark & Ron Ruiz |
| Moderated by: Vicki Talbott, lance, Keith Clark, Deborah, ArizonaEvp | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
f1cracker Member 
|
Hello everyone! A bit about myself, well, I started ITC research just this past January, 2008 with intent on connecting with my father who died in 1987. And while I have yet to contact him or any of my relatives, I have connected with others. Funny just to be sure I was trully connecting, I held up items in my home office, and asked them to tell me what I was holding, and to my amazement they did. My first test was to hold up a carved sailboat I made, and when I asked them to tell me what it was, of course I was expecting an answer of Sailboat, but the response I got was "Its a carving". The next test was to ask them if they could name the US President that my son drew in pencil in frame on my wall, and got a clear answer of "Bush". And after I completed another carving of a Dolphin, I got a variety of answers. Fish, Hippo, and two men that sounded of indian decent said Dolphin. See recording So where do I go from here. Well after getting all these recordings on my AM channel, I confided in a friend who happens to be a medium, and asked her if she knew of anyone using these radios to help spirits contact their loved ones, and she did not but made me an offer that changed my life forever. She was working a missing person case, and asked if I was interested in helping find this lad who had been missing a year now. She gave me his name, and the last location he was seen, and starting on February 23rd, 2008, I googled Earth the last location, opened up that view and started my recording. The missing child was 19. On the first 15 minute pass, I got nothing, so I switch to short wave radio for another 15 minutes, and only got one message but from a spirit that at least weekly calls out my first and last name when I record. He has a british accent, and never tells me who he is when I ask. I work from home, and saw I had about 30 minutes left before I had to start work, so I decided to go back to am radio again, and miracuously made contact with him. We are now at the stage where permits have been secured to check a pond where he says his body is located, but just waiting for the divers. I am amazed at all the info I have recorded most of which matches with what police already know, and info that they can now use as leads. I need some guidance. What is the best program to clear up the faint messages, I get? Mike Attachment: Dolphin.mp3 (Downloaded 1410 times) |
|||||||||
|
Keith Clark Administrator 
|
Hi Mike, Welcome to the forum! Your contribution and experience is welcome here. I have replied to your question in another thread here: http://www.itcbridge.com/forum/view_topic.php?id=497&forum_id=31 See you on the forum! Keith |
|||||||||
|
Vicki Talbott Moderator
|
Welcome, Mike! I've tried the radio sweep, using the protocal set out by Keith and others, with some fairly amazing results. Hope you continue to experiment in this area. Looking forward to sharing and learning. Vicki |
|||||||||
|
Surreal Member 
|
Hey Mike! Thanks for letting me know about the forum! Kristin aka (Surreal) |
|||||||||
|
f1cracker Member
|
Hi Vicky, not ignoring you... Just busy, and thanks for your note! Where can I find this Protocal? Mike |
|||||||||
|
Vicki Talbott Moderator
|
Hi Mike, Click on Keith's link above. I have found that using SW, a quiet recorder and just static works quite well, actually. I don't need the am radio voices to get very good relevant EVP. Vicki |
|||||||||
|
Keith Clark Administrator
|
Hi Mike, Vicki was kindly stating that I have shown a tendency to be somewhat strict with what I expect from sweep tuning, and my first posted examples were only trying to accomplish one thing: ask for a repeated word and receive a reply that just about everyone would agree on. We have already spoken of this on our other thread, and from what I have seen - our methods and level of acceptance seem to be pretty much the same. There is no protocol, per say - it's more like being very careful and procedural to make an educated objective experience on a controversial method.  Keith |
|||||||||