 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Dec 31st, 2006 |
| Location: | Clearwater, Florida USA |
| Posts: | 1637 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
My apologies, it would seem that perhaps my response was too heavy-handed and critical. Admittedly, it was, and your explanation of your language makes sense. Your words did come across in a way that did not appear to be positive, but provoking and critical. It would appear that my interpretation of your expression was incorrect, and for that I apologize. Your reply does indicate honesty.
I not only understand but also agree that there is much frustration on what seems to be the limitations of physical mediumship to prove life after death to the masses. (as well as some other methods) I think that will come one a more personal level, but still has to be one on one before it really takes hold and spreads. And I think the effect of physical mediumship is not very likely to be widely spread enough to do this alone.
I wish to discuss this with you more, but at the moment I must go. Please accept my offer of an apology for misunderstanding your intention.
Keith