 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Oct 28th, 2010 |
| Location: | Sicily, Italy |
| Posts: | 32 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Schreiber's almost perfect pictures weren't obtained only by the "oscillations" of the loop-pattern. As described at worlditc.org, he did a run first with recording the feedback-loop, then searched for faces by frame-analysis, and after that he rerecorded the found ones as still pictures from the tv set. While the rerecording took place those were taking on more humanoid shapes on a second tape.hello I have done something like that but with today's technology ..
So my question is: did anyone tried this? I don't have that much time, so does it worth a try? And should I buy UV and IR lights?, how much quintessential are they, how much do they help?
how? Kinovea I used to go to the fotogammi manually (you can 'also use virtual dub) I'm using this to try the slow-motion function that has Kinovea!
photos of the video to highlight the faces:
video original video with repeat recording
video original video with repeat recording
technique of shooting the same frame:
This is the frame between the very poor and got another one of my first tests ...:
here I have photographic enlargements from a different angle and tried to figure out if the light from the window could be used by turning the monitor:
and then I zommato scfocato part until you get that little face (lower left):
now I "zoom in" and the face looks better already:
here i zoom in and worked with the mass, heat, light from the window until you get this close enough defined:
working in the same way there appears the pupil:
more 'so I do not have to spit to do:
I used a 5 megapixel frames .. and you see that breast were ridimenzionati came off the page ..
........... Something that I think I understand that in this thing and take more 'time frames suspicious light and angle are still playing a role important.
I hope to be able to help (sorry for my bad english)
calo.
Last edited on Oct 29th, 2010 01:30 AM by calo