 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Dec 31st, 2006 |
| Location: | Clearwater, Florida USA |
| Posts: | 1637 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Frequently voices of people in physical mediumship seances, even those who claim to be a recognized person, do not sound as they should. (or do not exactly match their voices as they were known to be) It is said this is partially due to the difficulty of speaking through ectoplasm.
In cases where a recognized individual has a voice recording from their past physical lifetime - it could hypothetically be compared to some extent with their voices during a seance. In the case of Timothy, there is no basis for comparison. Granted, one should not just simply believe everything that is presented as physical mediumship by default - still, the best solution for that is personal experience. And unless you sit in that physical mediumship circle, there is no personal experience to form opinions.
We take a lot of what we hear of physical mediumship at face value - as we cannot all physically participate. Part of the earned trust is based upon the type of messages and information that is given during the seance. In my opinion, the sound of a voice is minimal, and not something that in itself can determine whether phenomena is legitimate. The real question is: is information being given that is known only to the sitter? That is the only true test.
I have yet to participate in a physical mediumship circle.
Keith