 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mar 15th, 2008 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 55 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I didn't receive a notification e-mail of new posts, so I didn't see your posting earlier.
It's my belief too that randomness is the basis for EVP/ITC as well as for most so-called Psi phenomena. And I too didn't notice any remarkable difference between true randomness and mathematical pseudo randomness.
I have a hypothesis for the origin of EVP which is based on synchronicity. Psychokonesis experiments in Psi labs have shown that although test persons were able to "influence" a display which was controlled by a random generator, no anomaly or fluctuation in the random signal itself was found. For this reason I don't think that it will be successful to use the characteristics of a true random signal as a reference to compare it to a second random signal in order to detect anomalies in it which may indicate meaningful EVP messages.
However, it's only my view; perhaps things are different -- it's surely worth a try...
Stefan