View single post by Keith Clark
 Posted: Oct 21st, 2008 07:12 PM
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Keith Clark



Joined: Dec 31st, 2006
Location: Clearwater, Florida USA
Posts: 1637
Status: 
Offline
 I have a comment in agreement with a part of Slider's above post.

Here it is simply:

If Dr. Rorke wants to prove his case about Spiricom not being valid, then that's fine. My question is this - after the dust has settled and some satisfaction has or hasn't been attained, what is going to be done to further the knowledge of life after death? If a hoax was perpetrated, what good is going to come of its discovery? What is the end result, and has anyone been helped.

To be sure, if the same intense attention and thorough research was applied to proving life after death - some serious ground could be covered. That's what I'm interested in.

Keith