View single post by Slider2732
 Posted: Oct 12th, 2008 10:26 AM
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Slider2732

 

Joined: Mar 3rd, 2008
Location: Muskogee, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 349
Status: 
Offline
I was in danger over on Stefans allophone/EVPmaker post of getting bogged down in the land of 'what the hell is Slider talking about' :blink:


Spirit Envelope Algorithms (or Spirit Environmental Algorithms), pronounced perhaps SEA, as in to see into the mystic world through an ocean of possibilities. Well, you get the idea.
It seems apparent that technologies like Stefans program, Frank's scanning radio and chips like the SpeakJet may well be leading us forwards with communications. As strong waveform shapes have been the elusive grail of many EVP researchers, many of us like the idea of big loud volume contact. Too many EVP recordings suffer from possibilities of voices, possibilities of noise contamination, possibilities that remove the possibility of spirit contact for sceptics!
While traditional tape recorder methods may deliver the actual voice of the deceased person wishing contact, it's time for a complimentary technology that will aid researchers.
Nothing better than a Class A EVP, but, as we know, such things are very rare.

SEA, would be a method of distinguishing spirit contact, then forming envelope parameters based upon that interaction.
Much like using a theramin, the presence of the spirit would affect the output of the waveform data by proximity interaction. Our little code for contact could be learned by people on earth just as readily and, it's hoped, this would cross to deceased people who may not be familiar with todays technology.
There is a parallel to Ouija methods, but primarily in understanding concept.

A simple example: A device outputs a sequential set of words, round and round, perhaps 20 or so words plus numbers...I, this, take, spirit, human, dead, interact, like, to, increase, hear, high, low, level, am, end, return, with, none, many, and, can, not, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0.
One quick hand wave for trigger, one slower hand wave for a pause.
By utlising this simple method, the following could be created merely with hand movements: I am human, I like to interact with human spirit, hear low level increase to 7.
The message would be that the person is human and likes to communicate in this fashion, but that they are having difficulty hearing the output and would like it increased to a 7 on the volume level !
There may be pauses in the delivery of such a message...but think of the possibilities within the paranormal field !

More complex parameters could be introduced to accomodate willing spirit contacts. The ease of use for a living person to operate such a device must come before the operations of the electronics. So, we strip out required movements as much as possible and have the brain work done by the electronics. It may be easy enough comprehension for us to say a word and an automatic voice recorder switches on, but that needn't follow the same for spirit contactees and their familiarities with technology. How would they know to make a noise to start a machine...that sort of thinking.
However, as with the debateable evidence of the K-II EMF meter and most certainly increases in EMF energy as popularly understood to signify spirit presence, proximity detection holds an exciting route forward.
To increase the usability of the method and forward the SEA principle, a spirit may be able to affect a sensed EMF reading and thus allow intonation. The device would be utilised as a conductor utilises his batton for an orchestra or the control of a theramin. The spirit could use increases and decreases of EMF level energy to form a simple strength and mellowness of tone. A strong opinion could be made by moving close to the receiving unit, less emphasis by keeping a distance. The receiving unit would detect such fluctuations and auto calibrate for the type of interaction being sensed.
Starting at simple on/off commands, the level of complexity would be sensed by the unit and give the resulting output.
 
Currently, for comparison, thousands of researchers out in the field have EMF meters that show a rise and fall on their screens or output a shrill squeek, we have the K-II with blippy trippy LED's and we have EVP recordings that unless we're lucky could often be interpreted 20 times differently by 20 different people.
 


 

Last edited on Oct 12th, 2008 10:30 AM by Slider2732