View single post by Jeff | |||||||||||||
Posted: Dec 15th, 2007 12:07 PM |
|
||||||||||||
Jeff
|
Notemanz wrote: Very interesting David! Let's all share any info we can glean on the original experiments for sure. Hello John, I see you too have read that article on 'duping' Mr. Meek. This poster of that article is obviously uneducated in electrical physics. He does not consider the RF energy being contained in a Faraday enclosure, which it was. A Faraday enclosure will not allow electromagnetic energy inside itself; nor allow electromagnetic energy generated inside itself outside. The alleged person with a radio across the street would have no effect on the device. Also, there was no microphone input from Mr. O'Niel to the RF generator; so a person with a radio tuned to the proper frequency would never be able to hear what was going on in the house across the street! The microphone in front of Mr. O'Niel was mixed to the tape recorder only. Actually, one of the tests built-in to Mark VI is a RF amplifier and antenna placed outside the Faraday enclosure. In this test mode, the transmitting antenna inside the cage is disabled, and the exterior antenna is enabled. Modulated RF is sent to the exterior antenna at the test frequency (in this case I'm starting at 29.575 MHz RF, modulated with 400 Hz audio tone). The radio receiver is tuned to that frequency to detect any modulation. If any leakage occurs, the modulated tone will be heard from the system monitors. As you know, this is to prove to the debunkers that the system will not respond to random radio broadcast, of any frequency. Especially dudes with radios nearby but out of site. I hope this clarifies, and supports your suspicions of that original poster. Jeff Last edited on Dec 15th, 2007 01:34 PM by Jeff |
||||||||||||
|