View single post by Tobias Claren
 Posted: Jun 16th, 2017 08:44 PM
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Tobias Claren

 

Joined: Jun 9th, 2017
Location:  
Posts: 8
Status: 
Offline
Hello.

For "earth bound spirits", or itc voices?
I think you mean "ghosts", because of using the term "spirit box"? A "ghost hunting spirit box"?


In theory, "earth-bound spirits" and "ITC-Souls" does not manipulate existing EM-Fields, they generate their own fields.
Read about the ITC-experiment 1971 at Belling and Lee in Enfield. A tape recorder in a faraday cage (or faraday room), thats all.
And they had received voices.

And why this extra "noise"?
Is there a proof or "test series", that this is better?
Logically, as little noise as possible.
Very low baseline noise of an amplifier (microphone amplifier, Rekodrer ...).

And in a German ITC magazine (80'ss) they are contending that tape recorders worked better than newer recorders. But that may have been imagination. This is not a free magazine. I just read an old article on the Internet.

Thought:
Tape recorders had coils.
Especially the coil on the tape.
Take a coil instead of a microphone.
For example, a Telephone pick-up coil.
And you will get only EM, not sound waves.
With a stereo microphone-amp or recorder you could hear/record both at the same time. EM, and for the context sound waves from a microphone.


Perhaps in a faradayan cage. But this is a option for ITC.
Because, ITC "voices" allegedly speak direct from "there" to here".

Possibly, ghosts on Earth emit EM fields and do not speak exactly and consciously into the technique.
You know what I mean?

A Faraday cage would be an advantage to avoid external influences.
But it should also not prevent results.

What is the current experience and theory?

Do you hear local spirits in a device that is shielded in a Faraday cage?
There are also bags for "Spirit boxes".
But it must be sure that you not only hear ITC voices (great success, but not the goal here), but local spirits.

The same with a radio receiver.
There is a Faraday cage even more meaningful.
The fast scanning with a radio, is only to prevent you to hear speech shards of radio stations?
If you put a radio receiver into a Faraday cage (or bag), you can do without fast scanning, or not?
Because "ghosts" would be a natural EM source, they would have to "send" over a relatively wide frequency range.
Therefore it would be ideal, you could operate a radio receiver without limiting to a frequency in a Faraday cage.
For example, the "Psychophone" (pcb layout in the internet, not the T. A. Edison myth).
A "radio", that receive many frequencies (a wide range) at the same time.

Best way, both at the same time.
EM and radio...
But with, or without faraday cage (for local "earth bound" spirits)?

Recording is certainly not unimportant. As a proof etc..
But then you have 3 channels:
1. EM, 2. radio and 3. sound waves (for context, questions of users, exact insert in videos with "plural eyes" etc.).

Impractical. Stereorecorders and stereo tracks are common.
Compromise:
EM and radio to a single "ghost" channel.
Possible problem:
EM-Field (via the "telephone pickup coil", or similar coil [values?]) over a low-noise microphone amplifier or recorder is low-noise. It's good.
If the radio receiver has a ground noise, it makes the low-noise signal of the EM receiver "dirtier".

Last edited on Jun 16th, 2017 08:57 PM by Tobias Claren